HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1625 of 2026 Alok Kumar Pandey .....Appellant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Sushil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 13 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. Order on Bail Application 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the appellant namely, Alok Kumar Pandey along with the appeal seeking release of the appellant on bail during pendency of the appeal. The prayer clause of the bail application is delineated below :-"That for the facts and reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to enlarge the appellant during the pendency of this Criminal Appeal."

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no specific role has been assigned to the appellant for causing injury to the injured. He further submits that the case against the appellant has not been proved beyond all reasonable doubts by the prosecution. He further submits that there is no conviction under section 34 IPC, therefore, for common intention, no person can be convicted. He further submits that there is no likelihood of final hearing of this appeal in near future. He further submits that marriage of daughter of the appellant is scheduled on 19.06.2026 and the appellant, being the father of the bride, has to perform the rituals i.e. CRLA No. 1625 of 2026 2 Kanyadaan. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposes the bail application and submits that there is active participation of the appellant in commission of the alleged crime, which is serious in nature and he should not be granted bail by this Court.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the marriage of appellant's daughter, let the appellant Alok Kumar Pandey, convicted under Section 325, 324, 323, 308 IPC in S.T. No.361 of 2015 (State vs. Ichhansh Pandey and others), FIR/Case Crime No.410 of 2013, P.S. Neem Gaon, District-Lakhimpur, be forthwith released on bail on furnishing his personal bond of Rs.15,000/- along with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate in the light of judgment of this Court passed in Smt. Bacchi Devi vs. State of U.P. and another, 2025 SCC OnLine All 5286. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7. The realization of fine amount imposed by trial court vide judgment and order dated 03.06.2026 shall remain stayed during the pendency of this appeal. Order on appeal 8. List this appeal on its turn. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) June 11, 2026 Manish Himwan Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench