Allahabad High Court

Saurabh Tripathi v. State of U.P. thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Civil Defence, U.P., Lko. & Ors.

WRIA/6075/2026

Decision date
2026-06-11
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Karunesh Singh Pawar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6075 of 2026 Saurabh Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Civil Defence, U.P., Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner prays for the following main reliefs:- "(i) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opposite party no. 2/ Director General of Police, Civil Defence Directorate, 528 Jawahar Bhawan, Pancham Tal, Ashok Marg, Lucknow to allow the transfer application of the petitioner dated 08.5.2026 and permit him to join at Lucknow. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction of suitable nature thereby directing to O.P. No. 1/ Additional Chief Secretory, Department of Rural Development, Government of U.P. Lucknow, to consider and decide the representation of petitioner dated 05.6.2026, within a time framed manner, vide Annexure No.9 of the running paper book." After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation raising his grievances before respondent no. 1, with a direction to decide the same within a stipulated period.

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid and without entering into the merits of the case, the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent WRIA No. 6075 of 2026 2 no. 1 within a period of one week from today. In case such a representation is submitted, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent no. 1 within a further period of three weeks, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of. June 11, 2026 Vinay/- (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench