Allahabad High Court
Mohd Nayeem v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. & Ors.
WRIA/6037/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-11
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6037 of 2026 Mohd Nayeem .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shailendra Singh Chauhan Court No. - 3 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State and Sri K.K. Pandey, Advocate, who has filed the Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that by the impugned order dated 31.05.2026, the petitioner has been transferred from his present place of posting to Nagar Nigam, Bareilly. It is submitted that the petitioner had earlier filed Service Single No. 18395 of 2021 challenging his transfer order, wherein an interim order dated 24.08.2021 was passed staying the operation of the impugned transfer order. The said writ petition is still pending and the interim order passed therein continues to operate. Despite the same, the petitioner has again been transferred by means of the impugned order contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.
It is further submitted that in similar circumstances, and considering the fact that the earlier transfer order has been stayed during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner ought not to have been transferred. The petitioner seeks parity with the order dated 15.07.2024 passed in Writ - A No. 5202 of 2024. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State submits that he has no instructions in the matter. WRIA No. 6037 of 2026 2 Perused the record, as also the order passed in the earlier petition filed by the petitioner and the order passed in Writ - A No. 5202 of 2024. List this matter on 16.07.2026 along with Service Single No. 18395 of 2021. Learned Standing Counsel for the State may seek complete written instructions in the matter by the next date fixed. In the interest of justice, it is provided that in case the petitioner has not been relieved as on date pursuant to the impugned transfer order contained in Annexure No. 1, he shall not be relieved till the next date of listing. June 11, 2026 Vinay/- (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench