HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4846 of 2026 Dhan Kumar .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 13 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Heard Smt. Uma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pintu Kumar, learned counsel for O.P. Nos.2 and 3. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has filed the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on the strength of compromise with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause of the application. The relief which has been mentioned in the application is delineated below:-

"It is therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and quash the entire proceeding of Special Session Trail No. 2384 of 2025 (State Versus Nadeem ) arising out of Case Crime No. 370 of 2025, Under Section 75(2),351(3) B.N.S and Section 67 I.T.Act and Section 3(1)(ब) (1), 3(2) Va, S.C./ S.T (P.A.) Act, Police Station Bhojpur, District-Moradabad pending in the court of Special Judge, S.C./S.T.(P.A.) Act, Moradabad as well as Charge Sheet dated 20.09.2025 and Cognizance order dated 17.12.2025 passed by Special Judge, S.C./S.T.(P.A.) Act, Moradabad. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the entire proceeding of Special Session Trail No. 2384 of 2025 (State Versus Nadeem) arising out of Case Crime No. 370 of 2025, Under Section 75(2),351(3) B.N.S and Section 67 I.T.Act and Section 3(1)(6)(1) 3(2)Va,S.C./ S.T. (P.A.) Act, Police Station -Bhojpur, District-Moradabad pending in the court of Special Judge, S.C./S.T.(P.A.) Act, Moradabad as well as Charge Sheet dated 20.09.2025 and Cognizance order dated 17.12.2025 passed by Special Judge, S.C./S.T.(P.A.) Act, Moradabad, A482 No. 4846 of 2026 2 during the pendency of the instant application, otherwise the applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. And/or to pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and arrived at compromise. The compromise deed has been annexed as Annexure 5 to the instant application. They further submit that they want to appear before the trial court for verification of the compromise application. 4. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that in case compromise deed is produced before it, notices shall be issued to all the signatories to the compromise deed requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, the trial court shall proceed to verify the compromise. After verification of the compromise deed, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise deed will be made part of the record. 5. The trial court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copies of the report as well as compromise deed and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of three months, the proceedings of Case No. 671 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Dhan Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No.192 of 2017, under Sections 323, 342, 308 IPC, Police Station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh pending before the court of Additional District Judge, SC/ST Act, Pratapgarh, qua the present applicant, shall remain stayed.

7. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed to this application to the learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining their xerox copies on the record. (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) June 10, 2026 Manish Himwan Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench