HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4029 of 2026 Arvind .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjana Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 11 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R. No. 170 of 2026 under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Bachrawan, District Raebareli with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case and is in jail since 11.05.2026. It is further submitted on behalf of applicant that it is undisputed that one case has been shown in the gang chart and in the said case, the applicant is on bail. It is further submitted that there is no evidence for relalization of money by committing crime. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that the applicant undertakes that he will not involve in any activity, which is against the law. It is, thus, submitted that the applicant is entitled for bail. It is also submitted that in case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

4. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for grant of bail, but fairly concedes that in the case mentioned in the gang chart, applicant is on bail. BAIL No. 4029 of 2026 2 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for parties and going through the record as also in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant that the applicant will not involve in any activity, which is against the law, the twin conditions contained under Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act stand satisfied. 6. In view of above, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Let applicant, namely, Arvind be released on bail in F.I.R. No. 170 of 2026, on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.20,000/- and two reliable sureties each of the like amount, subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 BNS. (v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 BAIL No. 4029 of 2026 3 BNSS may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 BNS. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (a) opening of the case, (b) framing of charge; and (c) recording of statement under Section 351 BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court, absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

8. Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and the court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter regarding cancellation of bail. (Rajeev Singh,J.) June 9, 2026 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench