Allahabad High Court

Parvesh Maurya v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. & Ors.

WRIC/3831/2026

Decision date
2026-06-08
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 3831 of 2026 Parvesh Maurya .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neelam Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Brajendra Amiy Court No. - 2 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Ms. Neelam Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the account has been defreezed, therefore, the petition has become infructuous. To which learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the Bank have no objection. 2. Dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) June 8, 2026 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench