Allahabad High Court
Haseeb Khan & Anr. v. State of U.P. thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Home) Lko. & Ors.
CRLP/5436/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-03
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Divesh Chandra Samant, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5436 of 2026 Haseeb Khan And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Home) Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Mishra, Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, Noorain Husain Khan(Niazi) Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Aniruddh Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. In view of the orders proposed to be passed, notice to opposite party nos. 5, 6 and 7 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 to 4 to ensure the Bonafide compliance of the order dated 25.04.2026 passed by the SDO, Karnailganj, Gonda considering the interim injunction order dated 06.12.2025 passed by the Gram Nyayalaya, Karnailganj in regular suit no. 142/2025 and provide proper police assistance in cutting wheat crops upon land Gata no. 460स, 374स and 461 of Village- Selhari, Pargana- Pahadapur, Tehsil, Karnailganj, District-Gonda with the further direction that in future no interference be made by Respondent No. 5, 6 and 7 in possession of petitioners upon the land in question during the pendency of regular suit no. 142 of 2025 in the interest of justice."
4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners has requested that the petitioners may be permitted to approach the competent CRLP No. 5436 of 2026 2 authority for redressal of the grievance of the petitioners and if the petitioners approach the competent authority by preferring appropriate application which is permissible under law, appropriate action may be taken. 5. Be that as it may. The law is trite on the point that if any aggrieved person approaches any competent authority for redressal of his/her/their grievances under law, same should be redressed following the due procedure of law. Therefore, it is needless to say that the petitioners may approach the competent authority preferring an application/representation and if such application is filed, the same may be disposed of strictly in accordance with law, with expedition. 6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) June 3, 2026 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench