Allahabad High Court
Smt. Ramvati v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue U.P. Lko. & Ors.
WRIC/2856/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Indrajeet Shukla, Jaspreet Singh
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 2856 of 2026 Smt. Ramvati .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rinku Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 3 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the State respondents has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. 2. Submission of the petitioner is that he has made an application making a claim under the "Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojana" which is engaging the attention of the respondents and the same has yet not been decided. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has provided the copy of the written instructions dated 27.05.2026 under the signature of S.D.M Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow wherein it has been indicated that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground of limitation. 4. Having taken note of the aforesaid fact, as per the petitioner claimed has yet not been adjudicated rather the instructions from the State respondents are that the claim has been rejected.
5. Be that as it may, even if at all the said claim has been rejected on the ground of limitation as indicated in the instructions, the same cannot sustain scrutiny in light of the decisions of Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Smt. Sarvesh Devi vs. The State of U.P. and 3 others (Writ-C No.27527 of 2023) and Gautam Yadav vs. State of U.P and 3 others; 2020 (11) ADJ 321. WRIC No. 2856 of 2026 2 6. In view of the aforesaid, this Court does not deem appropriate to keep the matter pending or call for a counter-affidavit and ends of justice can be met by directing the State respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner afresh taking note of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as mentioned above. If the petitioner files a fresh representation before the authority concerned, the same shall be decided preferably within a period of four weeks from today. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Jaspreet Singh,J.) June 2, 2026 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench