Allahabad High Court
Aman v. State of U.P. thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko
BAIL/3961/2026
- Decision date
- 2026-06-02
- Text availability
- Full text
- Judges
- Zafeer Ahmad
Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗
Connected provisions and cases
No further provision or case links are recorded.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3961 of 2026 Aman .....Applicant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 12 HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant Aman seeks bail in Case Crime No. 664 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, Police Station Ganga Ghat, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused persons, namely, Mahesh Nishad and Mantani have already been granted bail by this Court in Bail Application No. 1439 of 2026 and 3764 of 2026 respectively. It is also submitted that main role of causing gunshot injury is attributed to co-accused Raj Kumar and not against any other co-accused including the present applicant. The applicant claims parity with the co-accused persons and prays that the applicant is also entitled for bail in the same terms. 4. There is no criminal history against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and he shall cooperate with the trial.
5. The applicant is languishing in jail since 9.11.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. BAIL No. 3961 of 2026 2 6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not deny the ground of parity being available to the applicant. 7. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 8. On due consideration of the fact that the applicant is in judicial custody since 9.11.2025; co accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court; the applicant undertakes that he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall appear before the court concerned as and when the date is fixed; and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 10. Let the applicant - Aman involved in the aforesaid Case crime number, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
11. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. 12. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) June 2, 2026 Fahim/- Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench