Allahabad High Court

Jainul Abdin v. Shanti Devi & Anr.

FAFO/542/2026

Decision date
2026-05-29
Text availability
Full text
Judges
Prashant Kumar

Source: Indian High Court Judgments, AWS Open Data (CC BY 4.0) ↗

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 542 of 2026 Jainul Abdin .....Appellant(s) Versus Shanti Devi And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vijay Shankar Trivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Court No. - 19 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Vijay Shankar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant and perused the material available on record. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2026 passed by7 learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Barabanki in M.C.C.P. No. 212 of 2022 (Shanti Devi and another Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. and another). 3. The contention of learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal did not have recorded any finding to the effect that how the appellant is liable to pay compensation as the belated FIR and postmortem report do not substantiate the findings recorded by the Tribunal 4. Issue notice to the respondent returnable at an early date. 5. Steps for service of notice be taken within ten days. 6. List this case on 31.07.2026 after service of notice. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) May 29, 2026 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench