Allahabad High Court

Mangal Chauhan & Ors. v. State of U.P

2024:AHC:177944 · NABAIL/10585/2024

Decision date
2024-11-12
Text availability
Full text

Source: Official court records

Connected provisions and cases

No further provision or case links are recorded.

Judgment text

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:177944 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10585 of 2024 Applicant :- Mangal Chauhan And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Surya Pratap Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Bhawesh Pratap Singh,G.A.,Kamala Kumari,Umesh Kumar Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Sri Surya Pratap Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant no. 2, namely, Ajay Chauhan has been arrested by the police, as such, the instant anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicant no. 2, has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application on behalf of applicant no. 2, stands dismissed as infructuous. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant nos. 1 & 3, Sri Umesh Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 4. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant no. 1 & 3 in Case Crime No. 176 of 2024, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 118(1), 110 of B.N.S., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District-Mirzapur, during the pendency of investigation/trial.

5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant nos. 1 & 3 have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant nos. 1 & 3 expeditiously. 6. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant nos. 1 & 3. 7. Accordingly, the relief as sought by the applicant nos. 1 & 3 through this application is refused. 8. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicant nos. 1 & 3 surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 9. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant nos. 1 & 3 before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. 10. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application on behalf of applicant nos. 1 & 3 stands disposed of. Order Date :- 13.11.2024 Aditya DigitallyDigitally signedsigned byby :-:- ADITYAADITYA KUSHWAHAKUSHWAHA

HighHigh CourtCourt ofof JudicatureJudicature atat AllahabadAllahabad