Tuesday, 15 September 2026

Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Submit News

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Columns
Interviews

⚖

Loading…

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Columns

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

⚖

Loading…

Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh

(1992) 1 SCC 719

Decision date: 1991
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Three cardinal principles for granting temporary injunction under Order 39: (1) Prima facie case, (2) Balance of convenience, and (3) Irreparable loss/injury.

Principle

Three cardinal principles for granting temporary injunction under Order 39: (1) Prima facie case, (2) Balance of convenience, and (3) Irreparable loss/injury.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Section Order XXXIX Rule 1 · Order 39 Rule 1

Find decisions citing this case →

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh

(1992) 1 SCC 719

Decision date: 1991
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 2-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Three cardinal principles for granting temporary injunction under Order 39: (1) Prima facie case, (2) Balance of convenience, and (3) Irreparable loss/injury.

Principle

Three cardinal principles for granting temporary injunction under Order 39: (1) Prima facie case, (2) Balance of convenience, and (3) Irreparable loss/injury.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 · Section Order XXXIX Rule 1 · Order 39 Rule 1

Find decisions citing this case →

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.