Law on Tips(LOTS)India's Premier Legal News

⌘K

Home
The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

⚖

Loading…

Law on Tips.

A free Indian legal platform. Bringing you the latest judgments, legislative updates, and in-depth legal analysis from the Supreme Court, High Courts, and Tribunals.

© 2026 Law on Tips Media Pvt Ltd.

Explore

The Bar Room
The Gazette
The Library
Compare Acts
Legal League
Judgments
Careers

Trust & Standards

About Us
Editorial Policy
Fact-Checking
Corrections
Methodology
Ownership
Masthead
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact

Subscribe

Get the latest legal news delivered to your inbox daily.

Bar News Acts League

ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta | Judgment | Law on Tips

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta

(2019) 2 SCC 1

Decision date: 2018
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Strict interpretation of Section 29A; pierced corporate veil; management and control disqualification prevents defaulting promoters from regaining assets.

Advertisement

Principle

Strict interpretation of Section 29A; pierced corporate veil; management and control disqualification prevents defaulting promoters from regaining assets.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. · Section 29A Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Chitra Sharma v. Union of India (Jaypee Infratech) · (2018) 18 SCC 575 · 2018 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.

Judgment Library/Case record

Supreme Court of India

ArcelorMittal India Pvt. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta

(2019) 2 SCC 1

Decision date: 2018
Text availability: Summary or case record only
Bench: 3-Judge Bench

Source: landmark_precedents seed

Case summary

Strict interpretation of Section 29A; pierced corporate veil; management and control disqualification prevents defaulting promoters from regaining assets.

Advertisement

Principle

Strict interpretation of Section 29A; pierced corporate veil; management and control disqualification prevents defaulting promoters from regaining assets.

Connected provisions and cases

interpretsThe Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. · Section 29A Other decisions on this provision →

Related judgments

Chitra Sharma v. Union of India (Jaypee Infratech) · (2018) 18 SCC 575 · 2018 · 1 shared provision

Judgment text

Full judgment text is not available in this record.