Section 27: When rescission may be adjudged or refused

Q: What does Section 27 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA) deal with?

Section 27 SRA pertains to "When rescission may be adjudged or refused". It is part of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a legislation enacted by the Parliament of India. Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA) governs when rescission may be adjudged or refused.

Q: Is Section 27 SRA still in force?

Yes, Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is currently in force across the Republic of India.

Q: What is धारा 27 SRA?

धारा 27 SRA is the Devanagari Hindi reference for Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA) governs when rescission may be adjudged or refused.

Q: What is Dhara 27 SRA?

Dhara 27 SRA is the Roman Hindi reference for Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. "Dhara" means "Section" in Hindi. Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA) governs when rescission may be adjudged or refused.

Q: How to cite Section 27 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?

Cite as: "Section 27, Specific Relief Act, 1963 (SRA)" in legal briefs. For academic writing, use the BlueBook format: Specific Relief Act, 1963, 1963, § 27 (India).

Law on Tips Editorial Board

Any person interested in a contract may sue to have it rescinded, and such rescission may be adjudged by the court in any of the following cases, namely:-
1. where the contract is voidable or terminable by the plaintiff;
2. where the contract is unlawful for causes not apparent on its face and the defendant is more to blame than the plaintiff.
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the court may refuse to rescind the contract-
1. where the plaintiff has expressly or impliedly ratified the contract; or
2. where, owing to the change of circumstances which has taken place since the making of the contract (not being due to any act of the defendant), the parties cannot be substantially restored to the position in which they stood when the contract was made; or
3. where third parties have, during the subsistence of the contract, acquired rights in good faith and for value and it would be inequitable to rescind.

Any person interested in a contract may sue to have it rescinded, and such rescission may be adjudged by the court in any of the following cases, namely:-
1. where the contract is voidable or terminable by the plaintiff;
2. where the contract is unlawful for causes not apparent on its face and the defendant is more to blame than the plaintiff.
Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the court may refuse to rescind the contract-
1. where the plaintiff has expressly or impliedly ratified the contract; or
2. where, owing to the change of circumstances which has taken place since the making of the contract (not being due to any act of the defendant), the parties cannot be substantially restored to the position in which they stood when the contract was made; or
3. where third parties have, during the subsistence of the contract, acquired rights in good faith and for value and it would be inequitable to rescind.