1. The jurisdiction to decree specific performance is discretionary, and the court is not bound to grant such relief merely because it is lawful to do so; but the discretion of the court is not arbitrary but sound and reasonable, guided by judicial principles and capable of correction by a court of appeal.
2. The following are cases in which the court may properly exercise discretion not to decree specific performance:-
   1. where the terms of the contract or the conduct of the parties at the time of entering into the contract or the other circumstances under which the contract was entered into are such that the contract, though not voidable, gives the plaintiff an unfair advantage over the defendant; or
   2. where the performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff.
3. The court may properly exercise discretion to decree specific performance in a case where the plaintiff has done substantial acts or suffered losses in consequence of a contract capable of specific performance.
4. The court shall not refuse to any party specific performance of a contract merely on the ground-
   1. that the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the party seeking to enforce it; or
   2. that the contract is for an inadequate consideration.