any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation; or

Regional Labour Commissioner; or

Assistant Labour Commissioner with at least two years' experience; or

any officer of the State Government not below the rank of Assistant Labour Commissioner with at least two years' experience; or

a presiding officer of any Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), or under any corresponding law relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in the State; or

any other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or a Judicial Magistrate, as the authority to hear and decide for any specified area all claims arising out of deductions from the wages, or delay in payment of the wages, of persons employed or paid in that area, including all matters incidental to such claims:

Provided that where the appropriate Government considers it necessary so to do, it may appoint more than one authority for any specified area and may, by general or special order, provide for the distribution or allocation of work to be performed by them under this Act.]

(2)

Where contrary to the provisions of this Act any deduction has been made from the wages of an employed person, or any payment of wages has been delayed, such person himself, or any legal practitioner or any official of a registered trade union authorised in writing to act on his behalf, or any Inspector under this Act, or any other person acting with the permission of the authority appointed under sub-section (1), may apply to such authority for a direction under sub-section (3):

Provided that every such application shall be presented within [twelve months] [ Substituted by Act 53 of 1964, Section 13, for " six months " (w.e.f. 1.2.1965).] from the date on which the deduction from the wages was made or from the date on which the payment of the wages was due to be made, as the case may be:

Provided further that any application may be admitted after the said period of [twelve months] [ Substituted by Act 53 of 1964, Section 13, for " six months " (w.e.f. 1.2.1965).] when the applicant satisfies the authority that he had sufficient cause for not making the application within such period.

(3)

[ When any application under sub-section (2) is entertained, the authority shall hear the applicant and the employer or other person responsible for the payment of wages under section 3, or give them an opportunity of being heard, and, after such further inquiry, if any, as may be necessary, may, without prejudice to any other penalty to which such employer or other person is liable under this Act, direct the refund to the employed person of the amount deducted, or the payment of the delayed wages, together with the payment of such compensation as the authority may think fit, not exceeding ten times the amount deducted in the former case and not exceeding three thousand rupees but not less than one thousand five hundred rupees in the latter, and even if the amount deducted or delayed wages are paid before the disposal of the application, direct the payment of such compensation, as the authority may think fit, not exceeding two thousand rupees:

Provided that a claim under this Act shall be disposed of as far as practicable within a period of three months from the date of registration of the claim by the authority:

Provided further that the period of three months may be extended if both parties to the dispute agree for any bona fide reason to be recorded by the authority that the said period of three months may be extended to such period as may be necessary to dispose of the application in a just manner:

Provided also that no direction for the payment of compensation shall be made in the case of delayed wages if the authority is satisfied that the delay was due to-

(a) a bona fide error or bona fide dispute as to the amount payable to the employed person; or

(b) the occurrence of an emergency, or the existence of exceptional circumstances, the person responsible for the payment of the wages was unable, in spite of exercising reasonable diligence; or

(c) the failure of the employed person to apply for or accept payment.] [ Substituted by Act 41 of 2005, Section 8, for sub-Section (3) (w.e.f. 9.11.2005).]

(4)

[ If the authority hearing an application under this section is satisfied,-

(a) that the application was either malicious or vexatious, the authority may direct that a penalty ] [not exceeding three hundred seventy five rupees] [ Substituted by Act 41 of 2005, Section 8, for " not exceeding fifty rupees " (w.e.f. 9.11.2005).][be paid to the employer or other person responsible for the payment of wages by the person presenting the application; or [Substituted by Act 53 of 1964, Section 13, for sub-Section (4) (w.e.f. 1.2.1965). ]

(b) that in any case in which compensation is directed to be paid under sub-section (3), the applicant ought not to have been compelled to seek redress under this section, the authority may direct that a penalty ] [not exceeding three hundred seventy five rupees] [Substituted by Act 41 of 2005, Section 8, for " not exceeding fifty rupees " (w.e.f. 9.11.2005). ][be paid to ] [Substituted by Act 53 of 1964, Section 13, for sub-Section (4) (w.e.f. 1.2.1965). ] [the appropriate Government] [ Substituted by Act 41 of 2005, Section 3, for " the State Government " (w.e.f. 9.11.2005).][by the employer or other person responsible for the payment of wages. [Substituted by Act 53 of 1964, Section 13, for sub-Section (4) (w.e.f. 1.2.1965). ]

(5)

Any amount directed to be paid under this section may be recovered-

(a) if the authority is a Magistrate, by the authority as if it were a fine imposed by him as Magistrate, and

(b) if the authority is not a Magistrate, by any Magistrate to whom the authority makes application in this behalf, as if it were a fine imposed by such Magistrate.