Section 38: Presumption as to the public interest .-(1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say

Q: What does Section 38 of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP) deal with?

Section 38 MRTP pertains to "Presumption as to the public interest .-(1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say". It is part of the The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, a legislation enacted by the Parliament of India. Section 38 of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP) governs presumption as to the public interest .-(1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say. As verified on 19 May 2026.

Q: Is Section 38 MRTP still in force?

Yes, Section 38 of the The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 is currently in force across the Republic of India.

Q: What is धारा 38 MRTP?

धारा 38 MRTP is the Devanagari Hindi reference for Section 38 of the The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. Section 38 of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP) governs presumption as to the public interest .-(1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say. As verified on 19 May 2026.

Q: What is Dhara 38 MRTP?

Dhara 38 MRTP is the Roman Hindi reference for Section 38 of the The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. "Dhara" means "Section" in Hindi. Section 38 of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP) governs presumption as to the public interest .-(1) For the purposes of any proceedings before the Commission under section 37, a restrictive trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest unless the Commission is satisfied of any one or more of the following circumstances, that is to say. As verified on 19 May 2026.

Q: How to cite Section 38 of The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969?

Cite as: "Section 38, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (MRTP)" in legal briefs. For academic writing, use the BlueBook format: The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, § 38 (India).

Law on Tips Editorial Board

that the restriction is reasonably necessary, having regard to the character of the goods to which it applies, to protect the public against injury (whether to persons or to premises) in connection with the consumption, installation or use of those goods;

that the removal of the restriction would deny to the public as purchasers, consumers or users of any goods, other specific and substantial benefits or advantages enjoyed or likely to be enjoyed by them as such, whether by virtue of the restriction itself or of any arrangements or operations resulting therefrom;

that the restriction is reasonably necessary to counteract measures taken by any one person not party to the agreement with a view to preventing or restricting competition in or in relation to the trade or business in which the persons party thereto are engaged;

that the restriction is reasonably necessary to enable the persons party to the agreement to negotiate fair terms for the supply of goods to, or the acquisition of goods from, any one person not party thereto who controls a preponderant part of the trade or business of acquiring or supplying such goods, or for the supply of goods to any person not party to the agreement and not carrying on such a trade or business who, either alone or in combination with any other such persons, controls a preponderant part of the market for such goods;

that, having regard to the conditions actually obtaining or reasonably foreseen at the time of the application, the removal of the restriction would be likely to have a serious and persistent adverse effect on the general level of unemployment in an area, or in areas taken together, in which a substantial proportion of the trade, or industry to which the agreement relates is situated;

that, having regard to the conditions actually obtaining or reasonably foreseen at the time of the application, the removal of the restriction would be likely to cause a reduction in the volume or earnings of the export business which is substantial either in relation to the whole export business of India or in relation to the whole business (including export business) of the said trade or industry;

that the restriction is reasonably required for purposes in connection with the maintenance of any other restriction accepted by the parties, whether under the same agreement or under any other agreement between them, being a restriction which is found by the Commission not to be contrary to the public interest upon grounds other than those specified in this paragraph, or has been so found in previous proceedings before the Commission; [*]

that the restriction does not directly or indirectly restrict or discourage competition to any material degree in any relevant trade or industry and is not likely to do so;

[ that such restriction has been expressly authorised and approved by the Central Government; [Inserted by Act 30 of 1984, Section 32 (w.e.f. 1.8.1984). ]

that such restriction is necessary to meet the requirements of the defence of India or any part thereof, or for the security of the State; or

that the restriction is necessary to ensure the maintenance of supply of goods and services essential to the community,]

and is further satisfied (in any such case) that the restriction is not unreasonable having regard to the balance between those circumstances and any detriment to the public or to persons not parties to the agreement (being purchasers, consumers or users of goods produced or sold by such parties, or persons engaged or seeking to become engaged in the trade or business of selling such goods or of producing or selling similar goods) resulting or likely to result from the operation of the restriction.

(2)

In this section "purchasers ", "consumers " and "users " include persons purchasing, consuming or using for the purpose or in course of trade or business or for public purposes; and references in this section to any one person include references to any two or more persons being inter-connected undertakings or individuals carrying on business in partnership with each other.