Where an appeal is dismissed under rule 11, sub-rule (2) or rule 17 or rule 18, the appellant may apply to the Appellate Court for the re-admission of the appeal; and, where it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing or from depositing the sum so required, the Court shall re-admit the appeal on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.

High Court Amendments-[Andhra Pradesh].-Same as that of Madras. [Bombay].-For the existing rule 19 and its marginal note, substitute the following as rule 19 and its marginal note: "19. Re-admission of appeal dismissed for default.-Where an appeal is dismissed under rule 11, sub-rule (2), or rule 18-A or rule 17 or rule 18, the appellant may apply to the appellate Court for re-admission of the appeal and where it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing or in taking necessary steps in the prosecution of the appeal or from depositing the sum so required, the Court shall re-admit the appeal on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit."-(1-10-1983). [N.B.-This High Court Amendment relates to the provisions as existed before the 1999 Amendment Act.] [Delhi].-Same as that of Madras. [Gujarat].-Same as that of Madras-(17-8-1961). [Himachal Pradesh].-Same as that of Madras. [Karnataka].-Same as that of Madras-(5-11-1959). [Kerala].-Same as that of Madras-(9-6-1959). [Madhya Pradesh].-In rule 19 (1), Order 41, after the words the figures "rule 11, sub-rule (2)" insert the words and figures "or rule 15-A" followed by a comma. [Madras].-Re-number rule 19 in Order 41 as rule 19 (1) and add the following as sub-rule (2): "(2) The provisions of section 5, Limitation Act, 1908, shall apply to applications under sub-rule (1)." [Punjab].-Same as that of Madras-(15-4-1955).

Where an appeal is dismissed under rule 11, sub-rule (2) or rule 17 or rule 18, the appellant may apply to the Appellate Court for the re-admission of the appeal; and, where it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing or from depositing the sum so required, the Court shall re-admit the appeal on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit.

High Court Amendments-[Andhra Pradesh].-Same as that of Madras. [Bombay].-For the existing rule 19 and its marginal note, substitute the following as rule 19 and its marginal note: "19. Re-admission of appeal dismissed for default.-Where an appeal is dismissed under rule 11, sub-rule (2), or rule 18-A or rule 17 or rule 18, the appellant may apply to the appellate Court for re-admission of the appeal and where it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the appeal was called on for hearing or in taking necessary steps in the prosecution of the appeal or from depositing the sum so required, the Court shall re-admit the appeal on such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit."-(1-10-1983). [N.B.-This High Court Amendment relates to the provisions as existed before the 1999 Amendment Act.] [Delhi].-Same as that of Madras. [Gujarat].-Same as that of Madras-(17-8-1961). [Himachal Pradesh].-Same as that of Madras. [Karnataka].-Same as that of Madras-(5-11-1959). [Kerala].-Same as that of Madras-(9-6-1959). [Madhya Pradesh].-In rule 19 (1), Order 41, after the words the figures "rule 11, sub-rule (2)" insert the words and figures "or rule 15-A" followed by a comma. [Madras].-Re-number rule 19 in Order 41 as rule 19 (1) and add the following as sub-rule (2): "(2) The provisions of section 5, Limitation Act, 1908, shall apply to applications under sub-rule (1)." [Punjab].-Same as that of Madras-(15-4-1955).