Loading…
Loading…
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 3,076–3,086 of 3,086 · Page 124 of 124
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105581/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant argued that the order passed by the Bench under Section-34 has not yet been complied with by the opposite party.
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppeared
Advocate · Appearances before RERA, NCLT, DRT, the High Court and the Supreme Court
3,086orders and judgmentsAll verified by Editor
Only the judgments in which Puneet Jain's actual appearance is verified from the court record and documents are listed here, and each is manually verified by the lawontips.com team.
Orders 3,076–3,086 of 3,086 · Page 124 of 124
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/02/105581/2023 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complainant's complaint was presented through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant was absent. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant argued that the order passed by the Bench under Section-34 has not yet been complied with by the opposite party.
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppeared
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126510/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. Both parties are also directed to upload their written arguments on the RERA portal complaint page within the next
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126062/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer, Bench-04 Respectfully submitted that on 42-02-2025, the hearing of complaints is scheduled before the Hon'ble Bench-04 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Because Sant Ravidas Jayanti on that date is declared a public holiday by the U.P. Gover
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126062/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
To: Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA, "Presiding Officer, Bench-04 [?]" It is respectfully informed that the hearing of complaints is fixed for the date 08-08-2025 in the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, before the Hon'ble Bench-04. However, on the said date, owing to a technical problem with the por
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125931/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested time to upload and file its written reply regarding th
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116498/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri C.K. Jha. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The parties are directed to upload their respective written arguments on the complaint page of the RERA
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR145/12/103839/2022 · for the respondent
Date: 05.03.2025 The complaint was presented through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by his representative, Shri [?] Yogesh Goyal. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The arguments of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for decision. (Adjudicati
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR145/04/107455/2023 · for the respondent
Date: 05.03.2025 The complaint was presented through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by his representative, Shri [?] Yogesh Goyal. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The arguments of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for decision. (Adjudicati
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
[?] video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh's brief holder, [?] Muskan Jain. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant has uploaded the amendment application along with its annexures on the portal, but its physi
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
Because of the unavailability of the Bench, the hearing of the said complaint, fixed under Section 34 for 09-04-2026, could not be held. Therefore, in view of the above, the file shall be presented for hearing on 28-04-2026. Date: 09-04-2026 Adjudicating Officer
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh's brief holder, Shri Shivang Pathak. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant has filed a complaint amendment application.
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126510/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. Both parties are also directed to upload their written arguments on the RERA portal complaint page within the next
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126062/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA / Presiding Officer, Bench-04 Respectfully submitted that on 42-02-2025, the hearing of complaints is scheduled before the Hon'ble Bench-04 at the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Because Sant Ravidas Jayanti on that date is declared a public holiday by the U.P. Gover
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/126062/2025 · Bench 1 · for the respondent
To: Hon'ble Chairman, U.P. RERA, "Presiding Officer, Bench-04 [?]" It is respectfully informed that the hearing of complaints is fixed for the date 08-08-2025 in the RERA Regional Office, Greater Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar, before the Hon'ble Bench-04. However, on the said date, owing to a technical problem with the por
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/125931/2025 · Bench 2 · for the respondent
The complainant's case was presented for hearing through video conferencing. On being called, the complainant appeared in person. On behalf of the opposite party, learned advocate Mr. Puneet Jain appeared. The learned advocate for the opposite company has requested time to upload and file its written reply regarding th
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. NCR144/01/116498/2024 · Bench 2 Gautam Budh Nagar · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri C.K. Jha. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The parties are directed to upload their respective written arguments on the complaint page of the RERA
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR145/12/103839/2022 · for the respondent
Date: 05.03.2025 The complaint was presented through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by his representative, Shri [?] Yogesh Goyal. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The arguments of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for decision. (Adjudicati
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR145/04/107455/2023 · for the respondent
Date: 05.03.2025 The complaint was presented through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by his representative, Shri [?] Yogesh Goyal. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The arguments of both parties were heard. The file is reserved for decision. (Adjudicati
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
[?] video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh's brief holder, [?] Muskan Jain. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant has uploaded the amendment application along with its annexures on the portal, but its physi
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
Because of the unavailability of the Bench, the hearing of the said complaint, fixed under Section 34 for 09-04-2026, could not be held. Therefore, in view of the above, the file shall be presented for hearing on 28-04-2026. Date: 09-04-2026 Adjudicating Officer
Undated
UndatedHearing orderAppearedVerified
Complaint No. ADJ/NCR144/01/126435/2025 · for the respondent
The complaint was presented for hearing through video conferencing. When called, the complainant was represented by learned Advocate Shri Atul Kumar Singh's brief holder, Shri Shivang Pathak. For the opposite party, learned Advocate Shri Puneet Jain appeared. The complainant has filed a complaint amendment application.